Of all the valuable assets that defense industry contractors have, their reputation and credibility with government customers and regulators rank among the highest. That's especially true as it relates to Law of War compliance and national security. In an atmosphere of increasingly pervasive regulation, heightened scrutiny, and aggressive enforcement directed at government contractors, members of the defense industry need to prioritize legal and regulatory compliance and risk mitigation. To do so, it is proactive and strategic to work with a defense contractor attorney Near Anderson, SC for tailored guidance.
U.S.-RECOGNIZED COUNTRIES in 2024
ONGOING ARMED CONFLICTS as of 2024
DEATHS FROM ARMED CONFLICT in 2024
If you're a defense contractor using Google to search for a defense contractor compliance attorney, you're probably well-versed in the Laws of War. But if you're unaware of these laws or you're starting a business geared towards DoD contracting, it's crucial that you understand IHL and the compliance standards you must meet. Otherwise, you could face serious consequences and lose your ability to provide goods and services across the domains of land, sea, air, space, and cyber.
The Law of War, often referred to as International Humanitarian Law (IHL) or the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC), comprises a set of international treaties and customary laws that establish guidelines for conduct during armed conflicts. Its primary aim is to minimize unnecessary suffering for the wounded and sick, prisoners of war (POWs), and civilians caught up in hostilities. In a nutshell, the primary goal of the Laws of War is to help save lives and promote some degree of humanity during armed conflicts.
To achieve this, IHL governs the conduct of wars, striking a balance between weakening the opponent and minimizing suffering. The principles of warfare are global. The Geneva Conventions, which form the foundation of IHL, have been ratified by all 196 states. Very few international agreements enjoy such widespread support.
All parties involved in a conflict must adhere to IHL, including both state forces and nonState armed groups. If the Law of War is violated, there are repercussions. War crimes are recorded and examined by nations and international tribunals, and individuals may face prosecution for war crimes.
The Law of War also applies to defense contractors, who must uphold strict compliance standards in order to sell their services. Sometimes, DoD contractors are unaware of or unprepared to meet these compliance standards. That is why they should consult with a government contractor attorney Near Anderson, SC, like Richard Waring, who focuses on Law of War compliance matters.
Some examples of Law of War compliance as it relates to defense contractors include:
Civilian ProtectionDefense contractors, especially private military and security companies (PMSCs), are obligated to follow international humanitarian law (IHL) concerning the safeguarding of civilians and civilian objects. They must promote that they do not engage directly in hostilities if those involved are considered to be civilians.
AccountabilityBoth people employed by defense contractors and the companies they work for may face legal accountability for breaches of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). This encompasses possible criminal charges for serious violations of the Geneva Conventions and assigning blame to superiors for the actions of their subordinates.
Use of ForceAlthough defense contractors are typically not permitted to engage in offensive use of force, they may be granted permission to utilize force in situations of self-defense or to safeguard other civilians or their property.
Four of the most basic rules of IHL include the following:
01Parties involved in a conflict must always make a clear distinction between civilians and combatants to protect the civilian population and their property. No attacks should be directed at the civilian population as a whole or at individual civilians. Instead, military actions should be aimed solely at military targets.
02Individuals who are unable or unwilling to engage in combat have the right to life and to be treated with care for their physical and mental health. They should always be safeguarded and treated humanely, without any discrimination. It is prohibited to kill or injure an adversary who has surrendered or who is no longer able to participate in the fighting.
03Neither the conflicting parties nor their military personnel possess an unrestricted right to select their methods and means of warfare. The use of weapons or warfare methods that may result in unnecessary casualties or excessive suffering is prohibited.
04Those who are injured or ill should be gathered and provided care by the party in control of them. Medical staff, health facilities, and transport vehicles are to be protected from attack. Individuals displaying the recognized symbol of the Red Cross, Red Crescent, or Red Crystal on a white background, as well as facilities and vehicles marked with these symbols, must be treated with respect.
Understanding DoD and international Law of War is about more than memorizing complex legal terms. Let's look at a real-life scenario where it applies.
Consider a drone strike aimed at a suspected terrorist hideout nestled within a crowded village. While the strike may be seen as a necessary military action, the risk of civilian casualties raises serious questions about proportionality. In this context, here's how the principles of the Law of War come into play:
ProportionalityIs the expected military benefit greater than the possible harm to civilians? Are there safer alternatives that could accomplish the same goal?
DistinctionIs it possible for intelligence to verify if the hideout contains solely combatants, or might there be civilians unknowingly present as well?
NecessityIs this the only way to tackle the threat, or are there less harmful alternatives that can be considered?
Situations like those outlined above are complicated issues. There are no easy solutions to them. Commanders often face heart-wrenching decisions, weighed down by the potential consequences of their actions. Meanwhile, defense contractors must take significant strides to promote that their products and services comply with DoD and international Law of War mandates.
That's why open and clear communication among military leaders, military companies, legal advisors, and the public is essential. By sharing their thought processes, the factors they consider, and the efforts made to reduce civilian harm, they can promote understanding and foster accountability. If you own a company that supplies the military or DoD, working with a lawyer who specializes in defense contractor compliance could save your business and your reputation.
In 2010, the global market for private military companies (PMC) was estimated to be worth $200 billion and to employ around one million individuals. Today, the PMC sector provides a diverse array of services, with some firms having more than ten thousand employees. In Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. Army has depended on private military firms and defense contractors for many reasons, including:
In March 2011, the U.S. Department of Defense cited more defense contractor personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq at 155,000 than active military members, 145,000. In those two regions alone, defense contractors accounted for 52% of the U.S. workforce. With those figures in mind and with increasingly volatile and dangerous attacks in areas like Israel and Iran, military companies are in high demand.
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): Many defense contractors - whether supporting U.S. Armed Forces overseas (OCONUS), supplying weapon systems or emerging technologies, or launching satellites and space assets - are unaware of their Law of War compliance and related national security obligations. These obligations are imposed by DoD regulations, federal law, and international humanitarian law. Conflict Orbit provides strategic guidance to help you understand, implement, and sustain Law of War compliance. Whether supporting intelligence operations, overseas DoD missions, marketing weapons technologies, or launching a satellite, Conflict Orbit stands ready to launch with you - into the next mission, and into the future.
Compliance Readiness can help defense and space contractors proactively meet their legal obligations under the Law of War, U.S. DoD policy and regulations like DFARS, and client-specific requirements before operations begin. Conflict Orbit provides tailored analysis on activities, audits, risk assessments, internal policy development, training, and contract support to facilitate your organization's preparation for conflict-related legal scrutiny. The goal is to help you operate lawfully, reduce risk, and demonstrate credible compliance in today's high-stakes defense and space environments.
Weapons and technology reviews help defense and space contractors assess whether their systems - kinetic, cyber, AI-enabled, dual-use, or space-based - comply with the Law of War and relevant U.S. laws and regulations. Since the government will conduct its own legal review before accepting and deploying a weapon system, a front-end legal assessment may help prevent costly redesigns, procurement delays, and legal and reputational risk early in the development, design, or post-design process. These reviews can identify and address legal risks up front, streamline government engagement, demonstrate due diligence (which can enhance credibility), and reinforce ethical operations, showing a commitment to lawful development that could save lives and reduce civilian harm.
For defense contractors, comprehensive risk assessments and mitigation services can mean the difference between being in business and bankruptcy. When tailored to the unique challenges of private military organizations, this service evaluates potential legal, operational, and compliance risks related to Law of War obligations, identifying vulnerabilities and recommending targeted strategies to address them.
Whether assessing technology, weapons systems, or operational practices, experienced attorneys like Richard Waring are needed for many reasons, including:
In-depth Law of War audits are very important for assessing and strengthening an organization's compliance with international and Department of Defense (DoD) Law of War obligations. These audits can carefully evaluate an organization's policies, procedures, training programs, and operational practices to help them better align with Law of War standards. When you hire a defense contractor attorney Near Anderson, SC to perform an audit, you're taking proactive steps to promote your operations adhere to Law of War principles. Just as important, you're demonstrating a commitment to lawful conduct in conflict scenarios.
Comprehensive partner due diligence and screening services, help organizations evaluate potential collaborators, contractors, or third parties for Law of War compliance and applicable regulatory standards. Due diligence and screening services may include the following:
By performing thorough due diligence, organizations can reduce the risk of partnering with non-compliant or unreliable entities, ensuring smoother and more lawful operations in conflict-affected environments.
Custom training and education programs from defense contract lawyers help your organization better understand Law of War obligations. Since training is often a necessity for defense contractors, it should always be taken seriously. IHL sessions go over a variety of topics, from following the Geneva and Hague Conventions to navigating ethical conduct in conflict zones, all tailored to fit your specific needs. Whether it's for senior leaders or frontline staff, this type of education and training gives you the knowledge needed to tackle legal challenges and keep practices lawful in highrisk situations.
Around the globe, conflict is evolving. If you're a defense contractor and you're not making adjustments to secure your operations, you could violate the Law of War. However, with compliance counsel from Conflict Orbit, you can focus on doing what you're best at while lead attorney Richard Waring protects your legal interests.
Throughout Richard's professional career, he has seen a lack of private legal services for companies who need guidance on maintaining federally and internationally mandated compliance with the Law of War. He also observed that many contractors are unaware of these requirements.
As a former Intelligence Officer with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and a current U.S. Army JAG Officer (National Guard), Richard has had real-life exposure to the Law of War. He is a creative and relentless attorney who also has a background in criminal justice (prosecution, defense, and investigations) and education in drone and space law.
DISCLAIMER: Conflict Orbit, LLC is a private law firm and Richard Waring is not affiliated with or endorsed by the DoD.
Richard investigated and prosecuted 1000s of criminal cases with relentlessness, including the most serious violent crimes. As a prolific trial attorney, he held countless criminals accountable for their actions while refining the skills of communication, attention to detail, and persistence in the face of challenging legal scenarios.
Having defended numerous clients accused of wrongdoing, Richard has the ability to view legal scenarios from all sides. He utilized creativity, persuasion, and a strong work ethic to obtain positive results.
Former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) intelligence officer in the Intelligence Community's Prisoner of War (POW)/Missing in Action (MIA) Analytic Cell. The Cell provides intelligence support to military personnel recovery efforts for POW/MIAs, hostages, and kidnapped individuals worldwide. The Cell also currently supports unresolved U.S. and allied kidnapping cases by politically motivated anti-U.S. groups around the world. This national security experience is invaluable to Richard's understanding of Law of War compliance.
As a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Army (National Guard) Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAG Corps), Richard received formal Law of War and national security law training. He currently faithfully serves both his country and state of South Carolina as a Judge Advocate, and Richard feels privileged to be able to serve in this capacity.
DISCLAIMER: Conflict Orbit, LLC is a private law firm and Richard Waring is not affiliated with or endorsed by the DoD.
On a personal level, Richard is committed to reducing the amount of harm to the wounded and sick, POWs, and civilians in armed conflict. He has reorganized his law firm to be an innovative option for organizations needing guidance on Law of War compliance. Above all, Richard finds duty to country and service to others the highest callings, and it inspires him to know that his work potentially saves lives.
Is your defense organization ready to withstand what the future holds? If you're unsure, now is the time to act. Contact Conflict Orbit today and protect yourself from an uncertain tomorrow.
DISCLAIMER: This information, which includes non-client endorsements and testimonials from paying clients, should not be construed as a guarantee of any result in your matter. Past results do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.
Dorman defensive back and Clemson football commit Kentavion Anderson is one of five finalists for South Carolina’s Mr. Football.The award is given to the best high school football senior player in the state. Anderson would be the first winner from Dorman. Finalists were announced on Nov. 1.Others up for the honor are J’Zavien Currence of South Point, Zyon Guiles of Carvers Ba, Zamaurious Robertson of Dillon and Tamarion Watkins of Northwestern. The winner will be announced at halftime of the North-South all-star Tou...
Dorman defensive back and Clemson football commit Kentavion Anderson is one of five finalists for South Carolina’s Mr. Football.
The award is given to the best high school football senior player in the state. Anderson would be the first winner from Dorman. Finalists were announced on Nov. 1.
Others up for the honor are J’Zavien Currence of South Point, Zyon Guiles of Carvers Ba, Zamaurious Robertson of Dillon and Tamarion Watkins of Northwestern. The winner will be announced at halftime of the North-South all-star Touchstone Energy Cooperatives Bowl in Myrtle Beach on Dec. 13.
Anderson is ranked as the No. 1 prospect in the state by 247Sports. He helped Dorman secure the Upper State’s No. 2 seed in the Class AAAAA Division 1 playoffs.
Currence is a defenisive back and quarterback who is committed to South Carolina. Before the Oct. 31 finish to the regular season, he had thrown for 1,587 yards and rushed for 785 yards with a combined 22 touchdowns. He intercepted three passes on defense.
Check out the all new PLAY hub with puzzles, games and more!Guiles is an offensive lineman who is committed to South Carolina. There have been only two players at his position to win the award: Kyle Young of Daniel in 1996 and Josiah Thompson of Dillon in 2023.
Robertson is a wide receiver who is committed to North Carolina. He had 58 catches for 1,206 yards with 13 touchdowns.
Watkins is a defensive back who is committed to Texas A&M and has 48 tackles with two sacks and an interception.
See which Upstate high school football players made Shrine Bowl All-Star Game in Spartanburg1995 – Jermale Kelley, WR, Berea (South Carolina)
1996 – Kyle Young, OL, Daniel (Clemson)
1997 – Chris Hope, DB, Rock Hill (Florida State)
1998 – Derek Watson, RB, Palmetto (South Carolina)
1999 – Mark Logan, QB, Greenwood (Georgia Tech_
2000 – Roscoe Crosby, WR, Union (Clemson)
2001 – Moe Thompson, DE, Stratford (South Carolina)
2002 – Eric McCollom, QB, Camden (Iowa)
2003 – Trey Elder, QB, Byrnes (Appalachian State)
2004 – JD Melton, QB, Myrtle Beach (Navy)
2005 – Prince Miller, DB, Byrnes (Georgia)
2006 – Malcolm Long, QB, Gaffney (South Carolina State)
2007 – Richard Mounce, QB, Blythewood (Charleston Southern)
2008 – Stephon Gilmore, DB, South Pointe (South Carolina)
2009 – Marcus Lattimore, RB, Byrnes (South Carolina)
2010 – Jadeveon Clowney, DE, South Pointe (South Carolina)
2011 – Shaq Roland, WR, Lexington (South Carolina)
2012 – Tramel Terry, WR, Goose Creek (Georgia)
2013 – Jacob Park, QB, Stratford (Georgia)
2014 – Matthew Colburn, RB, Dutch Fork (Wake Forest)
2015 – Tavien Feaster, RB, Spartanburg (Clemson)
2016 – Gage Moloney, QB, Northwestern (James Madison)
2017 – Dakereon Joyner, QB, Fort Dorchester (South Carolina)
2018 – Zacch Pickens, DE, T.L. Hanna (South Carolina)
2019 – Luke Doty, QB, Myrtle Beach (South Carolina)
2020 – Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Gaffney (Georgia)
2021 – Jaylen Sneed, LB, Hilton Head (Notre Dame)
2022 – Xzavier McLeod, DL, Camden (South Carolina)
2023 – Josiah Thompson, OL, Dillon (South Carolina)
2024 – Will Wilson, QB, Richland Northeast (N.C. State)
Todd Shanesy covers high school athletics for the Greenville News, Spartanburg Herald-Journal and Anderson Independent Mail in the USA TODAY Network. Contact him by email at todd.shanesy@shj.com. Follow him on X, formerly called Twitter, at @ToddShanesySHJ.
The upcoming general election in Anderson County is scheduled for Nov. 4.Voters will have the opportunity to cast ballots for a range of positions, including council seats and the mayoral seat.The Anderson County Council has also approved a referendum on a penny sales tax.This proposed tax is specifically for road and bridge repair and maintenance within Anderson County.In November 2024, voters rejected a similar penny sales tax measure.If approved, the tax would last eight years and generate $352 million f...
The upcoming general election in Anderson County is scheduled for Nov. 4.
Voters will have the opportunity to cast ballots for a range of positions, including council seats and the mayoral seat.
The Anderson County Council has also approved a referendum on a penny sales tax.
This proposed tax is specifically for road and bridge repair and maintenance within Anderson County.
In November 2024, voters rejected a similar penny sales tax measure.
If approved, the tax would last eight years and generate $352 million for road projects.
According to county leaders, all the tax revenue will be dedicated solely to improving infrastructure.
According to the Anderson County Voter Registration and Elections Office, to participate in the upcoming general election in Anderson County, residents must register at least 30 days before the election.
This means residents must ensure their voter registration is complete and up to date by Oct. 5.
Those who need to register or update their information can do so online, by mail with a South Carolina driver's license or DMV ID postmarked at least 30 days before the election, or in person at the county's election office, located at 301 N. Main St.
At the polling station, residents will be asked to show one of the following photo IDs.
Election Day is Nov. 4, 2025.
Here is a brief rundown of the open positions and seats in Anderson County.
The Town of Pelzer will have three council seats and the mayor's seat up for election in November.
Council candidates Mike Matthews and Donna Ide are running for office this year.
Additionally, Councilman Cruz West recently resigned, leaving an unexpired seat on the council.
Current Pelzer Mayor Will Ragland recently stated that he will complete his term but does not intend to run for re-election.
According to Ballotpedia, candidates for Mayor included:
According to Ballotpedia, candidates for Town Council at-large include:
For the November municipal election, residents of Pelzer can cast their votes at the following locations.
The Town of West Pelzer will vote for two at-large council seats.
Councilmembers Jeff Lee and Johnny Rogers are up for re-election, and their seats will be contested during the upcoming election.
According to Ballotpedia, the candidates who filed for the two at-large seats are:
West Pelzer Town Council At-large
Residents in West Pelzer will cast their votes at the following precinct.
The town of Honea Path will have three council seats open for election in November.
Current town council members in Honea Path include Ward 1 Earle Ashley, Ward 2 Sheila Caldwell, Ward 3 Jean Perrett, Ward 4 Marie Jenkins, and Ward 5 Dot Evans.
Additionally, Jim Taylor serves as the Mayor Pro Tempore.
Seats Open for the Election include the following.
Additionally, these council terms are set to end in November 2025.
According to Ballotpedia, candidates include:
Honea Path Town Council Ward 1
Honea Path Town Council Ward 3
Honea Path Town Council Ward 5
Polling locations include the following.
The Town of Iva's current council includes Mayor Bobby Gentry, Council Ward 1 Elmer Powell, Council Ward 2 Dwayne Kelley, Council Ward 3 Dallas Botts, and Council Ward 4 Paul Hart.
In the Town of Iva, all four council seats and the mayor's position will be up for election in November.
All council members are currently running unopposed.
According to Ballotpedia, an unopposed candidate is automatically declared the winner without a vote.
Polling locations include the following.
The city of Belton will also have three council seats open for election in November.
Councilmember for Wards 1, 3, and 5 for term expiring November 6, 2029.
Current Belton council members include the following.
According to Ballotpedia, candidates include:
Belton City Council Ward 1
Belton City Council Ward 3
Belton City Council Ward 5
Precincts involved and the polling locations are as follows:
The town of Pendleton also has three council seats open for election in November.
Current council members include Ward 1 Sarah James, Ward 2 Robert Mills, and Ward 3 Linda Carter.
According to Ballotpedia, candidates include:
Mayor of Pendleton
Pendleton Town Council Ward 1
Pendleton Town Council Ward 3
Precincts involved and the polling locations are as follows:
The town of Williamston has a mayor and four councilmen elected at large for four-year terms.
Additionally, two councilmen are elected for staggered terms.
The current government office includes
In Williamston, elections are held every two years, and there will be no election this year.
The Town of Starr has four council members: Ashley Price, Joseph Shaw, Jarrett Stone, and Jason Taylor.
Additionally, Starr's current mayor is Ed Sokol.
According to the Municipal Association of South Carolina, the Town of Starr and Williamston has a Mayor-Council form of government, and elections are held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of even years.
Town Council elections in Starr were held in November 2024, and the next general election for Town Council will be in November 2026.
Travis Rose covers Anderson County for the Independent Mail. Reach him via email at .
South Carolina beat Anderson 112-31 in an exhibition on Friday night. Here are three things that stood out from the win.– With the starting lineup set, the question going into the game was how Dawn Staley would utilize her bench. Maddy McDaniel was first off the bench, replacing Raven Johnson. Then Agot Makeer replaced Ta’Niya Latson.Adhel Tac and Ayla McDowell followed, with Maryam Dauda the last to get in the game as a replacement for Joyce Edwards. However, by that point Staley was substituting based on game flow...
South Carolina beat Anderson 112-31 in an exhibition on Friday night. Here are three things that stood out from the win.
– With the starting lineup set, the question going into the game was how Dawn Staley would utilize her bench. Maddy McDaniel was first off the bench, replacing Raven Johnson. Then Agot Makeer replaced Ta’Niya Latson.
Adhel Tac and Ayla McDowell followed, with Maryam Dauda the last to get in the game as a replacement for Joyce Edwards. However, by that point Staley was substituting based on game flow, so don’t read too much into that just yet.
It seemed like Staley wanted to get Edwards into a groove, which played into Dauda’s long sit.
– Anderson only played one player over 6-0, so Madina Okot and Adhel Tac didn’t really get tested. But Tac played to her height, grabbing eight rebounds to go with seven points.
Okot had an eye-opening game. She didn’t just play bigger than Anderson; she was quick, skilled, and smart. She hit a pull-up jumper off a dribble-drive, got behind the defense on a fast break for a layup, scored off a spin move in the paint, and found fellow transfer Ta’Niya Latson for a layup. That was just the first half.
Okot continued to have a great all-around game. She scored in the low post and the midrange, passed, defended, and even had a breakaway steal and layup. Okot finished with 17 points, 15 rebounds, six blocks, and three steals.
She wasn’t just the imposing big that South Carolina was missing last season. She was skilled, versatile, and efficient. That’s even more than South Carolina was hoping for. But boy, that basic through it up to the big girl and let her score play was nice to see again.
– The same asterisk applies to freshmen Agot Makeer and Ayla McDowell, who faced tougher competition playing for their national teams over the summer. But they did what was asked of them.
McDowell was solid, scoring six points and dishing some nice passes. But Makeer was outstanding. I’ve been hyping up Makeer for over a year, and even I didn’t expect her to look that good.
Makeer was second off the bench, and she rewarded that confidence with 16 points, six rebounds, five steals, and four assists. All offseason I said the freshmen don’t have to make a major impact; they just have to be capable of holding their own to give another player some rest. But Makeer looked like an impact player.
The big test comes next week when she faces much better competition in North Carolina.
The No. 2 South Carolina women’s basketball team tips off the 2025-26 season with an exhibition against Anderson on Friday night. These are five things to watch.1. Does anything look different (and hopefully better)?Sometimes you don’t learn anything from exhibitions. Sometimes you do.In 2023, the exhibition against Rutgers was the first inkling we had that the Gamecocks had something special. The opposite was true last season. The Gamecocks were fine but not quite firing on all cylinders, wh...
The No. 2 South Carolina women’s basketball team tips off the 2025-26 season with an exhibition against Anderson on Friday night. These are five things to watch.
1. Does anything look different (and hopefully better)?
Sometimes you don’t learn anything from exhibitions. Sometimes you do.
In 2023, the exhibition against Rutgers was the first inkling we had that the Gamecocks had something special. The opposite was true last season. The Gamecocks were fine but not quite firing on all cylinders, which ended up describing the whole season.
On the other hand, nothing about the 2019 exhibition suggested South Carolina was going to annihilate the rest of the SEC and finish as the consensus No. 1 team.
“My expectation is to play like you’ve been coached,” Dawn Staley said. “Play like you’ve been practicing. It’s not hard, (but) it may be a little difficult for some. There’ll be some people in here. A lot of people in here, hopefully, that will see them play for the first time, and it takes a while to make that transition.”
It would be nice to see Raven Johnson knock down a three-pointer or two, Tessa Johnson be aggressive on both ends of the court, and Joyce Edwards show continued growth in her game. Does the offense operate more smoothly than last season?
Attention: GamecockCentral has an updates/game thread for every South Carolina women’s basketball game. You can find them on the NEW approximately 30 minutes before tip-off.
2. The rotation
Because of Chloe Kitts’ injury, there isn’t much mystery with the starting lineup: Raven Johnson, Ta’Niya Latson, Tessa Johnson, Joyce Edwards, and Madina Okot. But after that, it’s fairly uncertain, plus they have to learn to succeed without Kitts.
“Chloe Kitts is a dog,” Staley said. “We just have to do it a different way.”
Every year, I make this same disclaimer: Dawn Staley uses exhibitions to experiment a little, so the lineups and rotations we see Friday night might not be what we see on November 3 against Grand Canyon.
Still, we get an idea of what Staley and the coaching staff are thinking. Which players play well together? What are the substitution patterns? Does anyone get some run at a new position?
3. The transfers
We get our first look at Ta’Niya Latson and Madina Okot in garnet and black for a game atmosphere. Both players are established commodities, but both are also being asked to do some things they weren’t asked to do at Florida State and Mississippi State, respectively.
How does Latson fit in? Do she and Raven Johnson pick up like they are still in high school, running free for fastbreak layups? Is she able to produce within the team concept?
“This is my first time in CLA so I’m a little nervous,” Latson said on Thursday. “I’m just working through things. She has me seeing things that I haven’t seen on both ends of the floor. I feel like I can integrate what I do and also be a better player, a better playmaker, and a better teammate.”
Is Okot the intimidating big that South Carolina lacked last season? We’ve heard great things about how she has played in practice. Can she do it against another team?
4. The freshmen
We’re less certain what to expect from the two highly-touted freshmen, Agot Makeer and Ayla McDowell.
Staley has been pleased with their progress so far. But losing Chloe Kitts for the season means South Carolina only has 10 players. That speeds up the developmental timeline for one or both of the freshmen.
South Carolina lists both Makeer and McDowell as 6-1 guards, but the Gamecocks need more depth at the three and four positions. Could that come from one of the freshmen?
Both have reputations as good shooters, boosted by Makeer’s impressive showing in the three-point contest at GarNET & Black Madness, can one or both shoot the three efficiently enough to replace Te-Hina Paopao and Bree Hall?
Makeer has shown potential as a lockdown defender, but is she as disruptive on the college level?
“I want them to be them. I don’t want to put pressure on them because they put enough pressure on themselves,” Staley said. “They’re super talented. They are confident. They’ve been holding their own.”
5. Rule Changes
There are several rule changes this season. Most are minor, dealing with uniform specifications and administrative details. There are small changes to how traveling and “hot stove” touches are officiated.
The biggest change is the addition of coaches’ challenges. Fouls can’t be challenged, but calls like out-of-bounds and backcourt violations can.
If I’m Staley, I challenge the first out-of-bounds call of the season just to break the ice.
For more information on the rules changes, read HERE.
The Ws
Who: #2 South Carolina vs AndersonWhen: 7:00 ET, Friday, October 24Where: Colonial Life Arena, Columbia, SCTickets are free. There is no television or radio coverage. GamecockCentral will have live coverage on the new Women’s Basketball Forum.
Attention: GamecockCentral has an updates/game thread for every South Carolina women’s basketball game. You can find them on the NEW approximately 30 minutes before tip-off.
Carl Sagan
Let's be the exception.