Of all the valuable assets that defense industry contractors have, their reputation and credibility with government customers and regulators rank among the highest. That's especially true as it relates to Law of War compliance and national security. In an atmosphere of increasingly pervasive regulation, heightened scrutiny, and aggressive enforcement directed at government contractors, members of the defense industry need to prioritize legal and regulatory compliance and risk mitigation. To do so, it is proactive and strategic to work with a defense contractor attorney Near Orangeburg, SC for tailored guidance.
U.S.-RECOGNIZED COUNTRIES in 2024
ONGOING ARMED CONFLICTS as of 2024
DEATHS FROM ARMED CONFLICT in 2024
If you're a defense contractor using Google to search for a defense contractor compliance attorney, you're probably well-versed in the Laws of War. But if you're unaware of these laws or you're starting a business geared towards DoD contracting, it's crucial that you understand IHL and the compliance standards you must meet. Otherwise, you could face serious consequences and lose your ability to provide goods and services across the domains of land, sea, air, space, and cyber.
The Law of War, often referred to as International Humanitarian Law (IHL) or the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC), comprises a set of international treaties and customary laws that establish guidelines for conduct during armed conflicts. Its primary aim is to minimize unnecessary suffering for the wounded and sick, prisoners of war (POWs), and civilians caught up in hostilities. In a nutshell, the primary goal of the Laws of War is to help save lives and promote some degree of humanity during armed conflicts.
To achieve this, IHL governs the conduct of wars, striking a balance between weakening the opponent and minimizing suffering. The principles of warfare are global. The Geneva Conventions, which form the foundation of IHL, have been ratified by all 196 states. Very few international agreements enjoy such widespread support.
All parties involved in a conflict must adhere to IHL, including both state forces and nonState armed groups. If the Law of War is violated, there are repercussions. War crimes are recorded and examined by nations and international tribunals, and individuals may face prosecution for war crimes.
The Law of War also applies to defense contractors, who must uphold strict compliance standards in order to sell their services. Sometimes, DoD contractors are unaware of or unprepared to meet these compliance standards. That is why they should consult with a government contractor attorney Near Orangeburg, SC, like Richard Waring, who focuses on Law of War compliance matters.
Some examples of Law of War compliance as it relates to defense contractors include:
Civilian ProtectionDefense contractors, especially private military and security companies (PMSCs), are obligated to follow international humanitarian law (IHL) concerning the safeguarding of civilians and civilian objects. They must promote that they do not engage directly in hostilities if those involved are considered to be civilians.
AccountabilityBoth people employed by defense contractors and the companies they work for may face legal accountability for breaches of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). This encompasses possible criminal charges for serious violations of the Geneva Conventions and assigning blame to superiors for the actions of their subordinates.
Use of ForceAlthough defense contractors are typically not permitted to engage in offensive use of force, they may be granted permission to utilize force in situations of self-defense or to safeguard other civilians or their property.
Four of the most basic rules of IHL include the following:
01Parties involved in a conflict must always make a clear distinction between civilians and combatants to protect the civilian population and their property. No attacks should be directed at the civilian population as a whole or at individual civilians. Instead, military actions should be aimed solely at military targets.
02Individuals who are unable or unwilling to engage in combat have the right to life and to be treated with care for their physical and mental health. They should always be safeguarded and treated humanely, without any discrimination. It is prohibited to kill or injure an adversary who has surrendered or who is no longer able to participate in the fighting.
03Neither the conflicting parties nor their military personnel possess an unrestricted right to select their methods and means of warfare. The use of weapons or warfare methods that may result in unnecessary casualties or excessive suffering is prohibited.
04Those who are injured or ill should be gathered and provided care by the party in control of them. Medical staff, health facilities, and transport vehicles are to be protected from attack. Individuals displaying the recognized symbol of the Red Cross, Red Crescent, or Red Crystal on a white background, as well as facilities and vehicles marked with these symbols, must be treated with respect.
Understanding DoD and international Law of War is about more than memorizing complex legal terms. Let's look at a real-life scenario where it applies.
Consider a drone strike aimed at a suspected terrorist hideout nestled within a crowded village. While the strike may be seen as a necessary military action, the risk of civilian casualties raises serious questions about proportionality. In this context, here's how the principles of the Law of War come into play:
ProportionalityIs the expected military benefit greater than the possible harm to civilians? Are there safer alternatives that could accomplish the same goal?
DistinctionIs it possible for intelligence to verify if the hideout contains solely combatants, or might there be civilians unknowingly present as well?
NecessityIs this the only way to tackle the threat, or are there less harmful alternatives that can be considered?
Situations like those outlined above are complicated issues. There are no easy solutions to them. Commanders often face heart-wrenching decisions, weighed down by the potential consequences of their actions. Meanwhile, defense contractors must take significant strides to promote that their products and services comply with DoD and international Law of War mandates.
That's why open and clear communication among military leaders, military companies, legal advisors, and the public is essential. By sharing their thought processes, the factors they consider, and the efforts made to reduce civilian harm, they can promote understanding and foster accountability. If you own a company that supplies the military or DoD, working with a lawyer who specializes in defense contractor compliance could save your business and your reputation.
In 2010, the global market for private military companies (PMC) was estimated to be worth $200 billion and to employ around one million individuals. Today, the PMC sector provides a diverse array of services, with some firms having more than ten thousand employees. In Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. Army has depended on private military firms and defense contractors for many reasons, including:
In March 2011, the U.S. Department of Defense cited more defense contractor personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq at 155,000 than active military members, 145,000. In those two regions alone, defense contractors accounted for 52% of the U.S. workforce. With those figures in mind and with increasingly volatile and dangerous attacks in areas like Israel and Iran, military companies are in high demand.
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): Many defense contractors - whether supporting U.S. Armed Forces overseas (OCONUS), supplying weapon systems or emerging technologies, or launching satellites and space assets - are unaware of their Law of War compliance and related national security obligations. These obligations are imposed by DoD regulations, federal law, and international humanitarian law. Conflict Orbit provides strategic guidance to help you understand, implement, and sustain Law of War compliance. Whether supporting intelligence operations, overseas DoD missions, marketing weapons technologies, or launching a satellite, Conflict Orbit stands ready to launch with you - into the next mission, and into the future.
Compliance Readiness can help defense and space contractors proactively meet their legal obligations under the Law of War, U.S. DoD policy and regulations like DFARS, and client-specific requirements before operations begin. Conflict Orbit provides tailored analysis on activities, audits, risk assessments, internal policy development, training, and contract support to facilitate your organization's preparation for conflict-related legal scrutiny. The goal is to help you operate lawfully, reduce risk, and demonstrate credible compliance in today's high-stakes defense and space environments.
Weapons and technology reviews help defense and space contractors assess whether their systems - kinetic, cyber, AI-enabled, dual-use, or space-based - comply with the Law of War and relevant U.S. laws and regulations. Since the government will conduct its own legal review before accepting and deploying a weapon system, a front-end legal assessment may help prevent costly redesigns, procurement delays, and legal and reputational risk early in the development, design, or post-design process. These reviews can identify and address legal risks up front, streamline government engagement, demonstrate due diligence (which can enhance credibility), and reinforce ethical operations, showing a commitment to lawful development that could save lives and reduce civilian harm.
For defense contractors, comprehensive risk assessments and mitigation services can mean the difference between being in business and bankruptcy. When tailored to the unique challenges of private military organizations, this service evaluates potential legal, operational, and compliance risks related to Law of War obligations, identifying vulnerabilities and recommending targeted strategies to address them.
Whether assessing technology, weapons systems, or operational practices, experienced attorneys like Richard Waring are needed for many reasons, including:
In-depth Law of War audits are very important for assessing and strengthening an organization's compliance with international and Department of Defense (DoD) Law of War obligations. These audits can carefully evaluate an organization's policies, procedures, training programs, and operational practices to help them better align with Law of War standards. When you hire a defense contractor attorney Near Orangeburg, SC to perform an audit, you're taking proactive steps to promote your operations adhere to Law of War principles. Just as important, you're demonstrating a commitment to lawful conduct in conflict scenarios.
Comprehensive partner due diligence and screening services, help organizations evaluate potential collaborators, contractors, or third parties for Law of War compliance and applicable regulatory standards. Due diligence and screening services may include the following:
By performing thorough due diligence, organizations can reduce the risk of partnering with non-compliant or unreliable entities, ensuring smoother and more lawful operations in conflict-affected environments.
Custom training and education programs from defense contract lawyers help your organization better understand Law of War obligations. Since training is often a necessity for defense contractors, it should always be taken seriously. IHL sessions go over a variety of topics, from following the Geneva and Hague Conventions to navigating ethical conduct in conflict zones, all tailored to fit your specific needs. Whether it's for senior leaders or frontline staff, this type of education and training gives you the knowledge needed to tackle legal challenges and keep practices lawful in highrisk situations.
Around the globe, conflict is evolving. If you're a defense contractor and you're not making adjustments to secure your operations, you could violate the Law of War. However, with compliance counsel from Conflict Orbit, you can focus on doing what you're best at while lead attorney Richard Waring protects your legal interests.
Throughout Richard's professional career, he has seen a lack of private legal services for companies who need guidance on maintaining federally and internationally mandated compliance with the Law of War. He also observed that many contractors are unaware of these requirements.
As a former Intelligence Officer with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and a current U.S. Army JAG Officer (National Guard), Richard has had real-life exposure to the Law of War. He is a creative and relentless attorney who also has a background in criminal justice (prosecution, defense, and investigations) and education in drone and space law.
DISCLAIMER: Conflict Orbit, LLC is a private law firm and Richard Waring is not affiliated with or endorsed by the DoD.
Richard investigated and prosecuted 1000s of criminal cases with relentlessness, including the most serious violent crimes. As a prolific trial attorney, he held countless criminals accountable for their actions while refining the skills of communication, attention to detail, and persistence in the face of challenging legal scenarios.
Having defended numerous clients accused of wrongdoing, Richard has the ability to view legal scenarios from all sides. He utilized creativity, persuasion, and a strong work ethic to obtain positive results.
Former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) intelligence officer in the Intelligence Community's Prisoner of War (POW)/Missing in Action (MIA) Analytic Cell. The Cell provides intelligence support to military personnel recovery efforts for POW/MIAs, hostages, and kidnapped individuals worldwide. The Cell also currently supports unresolved U.S. and allied kidnapping cases by politically motivated anti-U.S. groups around the world. This national security experience is invaluable to Richard's understanding of Law of War compliance.
As a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Army (National Guard) Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAG Corps), Richard received formal Law of War and national security law training. He currently faithfully serves both his country and state of South Carolina as a Judge Advocate, and Richard feels privileged to be able to serve in this capacity.
DISCLAIMER: Conflict Orbit, LLC is a private law firm and Richard Waring is not affiliated with or endorsed by the DoD.
On a personal level, Richard is committed to reducing the amount of harm to the wounded and sick, POWs, and civilians in armed conflict. He has reorganized his law firm to be an innovative option for organizations needing guidance on Law of War compliance. Above all, Richard finds duty to country and service to others the highest callings, and it inspires him to know that his work potentially saves lives.
Is your defense organization ready to withstand what the future holds? If you're unsure, now is the time to act. Contact Conflict Orbit today and protect yourself from an uncertain tomorrow.
DISCLAIMER: This information, which includes non-client endorsements and testimonials from paying clients, should not be construed as a guarantee of any result in your matter. Past results do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.
ORANGEBURG COUNTY, S.C. (WIS) - An Orangeburg County woman is now taking a hotel to court after claiming they caused her to be “held hostage” by her estranged husband.Records show Latasha Brown filed suit Oct. 24 against the operating parties of the Tru by Hilton in Orangeburg, with multiple people and LLCs linked to the hotel named as defendants.A representative from Hilton’s corporate office confirmed to WIS on Thursday that the Orangeburg hotel is independently owned and operated.Brown alleges that a...
ORANGEBURG COUNTY, S.C. (WIS) - An Orangeburg County woman is now taking a hotel to court after claiming they caused her to be “held hostage” by her estranged husband.
Records show Latasha Brown filed suit Oct. 24 against the operating parties of the Tru by Hilton in Orangeburg, with multiple people and LLCs linked to the hotel named as defendants.
A representative from Hilton’s corporate office confirmed to WIS on Thursday that the Orangeburg hotel is independently owned and operated.
Brown alleges that after she left her estranged husband in July 2024, he began stalking her and using GPS tracking to find her location. The lawsuit also cites one particular instance where he found her hiding in the trunk of her vehicle.
The lawsuit states Brown would stay in hotels to continue avoiding being stalked. It states that her husband tracked her to a hotel in July 2024 and attempted to confirm whether or not she was staying there and obtain a room key. The hotel did not do so, in a move that the lawsuit said followed industry standards.
On September 20, 2024, however, the lawsuit claims the Tru by Hilton in Orangeburg did the opposite.
It’s alleged Brown switched vehicles with a friend to try and avoid her husband locating her, noting that a GPS tracker was later found on her car.
The lawsuit claims her husband roamed around the hotel for hours before coming to the front desk, where a night auditor reportedly gave him a room key, told him what room Brown was in. According to the lawsuit, this was done without obtaining any form of identification or checking with Brown for authorization.
Brown claims she was “abused and held hostage” in her room for nearly five hours the next morning, with cries for help going unanswered by hotel staff.
“I can’t believe this happened to me at such a reputable hotel,” Brown said.
The lawsuit also alleges others were concerned, including a person staying next to the room Brown was in - but the concerns were not addressed by staff.
The lawsuit goes on to say that Brown was able to convince her husband that she had a work meeting and that her phone was dead - and that if she did not contact someone, police would be called. He also gave her $200 to fix her hair and nails, but Brown claims she ran through the lobby to get to her car after receiving the money.
Brown claims she was able to make it to her friend’s vehicle and eventually got away before flagging down an Orangeburg County deputy’s vehicle. She told the deputy what happened, leading to an investigation.
Tru by Hilton later filed an internal incident report, noted in the lawsuit, that stated security procedures were not followed. The lawsuit also claimed the night auditor “was not truthful” in their account of what happened. Documents go on to state the employee was later fired.
Brown is requesting a jury trial as well as damages.
Brown says her lawsuit is part of a bigger effort to bring safety to domestic violence victims.
“I can’t believe this happened to me at such a reputable hotel,” Brown said.“You think that you’re going somewhere, you’re safe and you’re behind this big heavy door but there’s a key that works and they can give it to anyone if they’re negligent and anything can happen to you once that door opens,” she said. “I do want people to know that we have to make sure that we’re safe, even when we’re working on our exit plans.”
Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our , and . Have feedback that can help us improve? .
If you or anyone you know is dealing with domestic violence, the following resources are always available:
Watch WIS live during newscasts and Soda City Living in the livestream player below. When WIS is not on the air, the player will feature Gray Media’s Local News Live.
Deputies say two women are charged after vulnerable adults were found in unsanitary conditions inside a Bowman Branch Highway home in Orangeburg County.BOWMAN, S.C. — Two women are facing kidnapping and neglect charges after deputies say vulnerable adults were found living in poor conditions inside a home in Orangeburg County.Deputies said the investigation began after a community health worker raised concerns about the care of several people at a home on Bowman Branch Highway.An incident report states that the wor...
Deputies say two women are charged after vulnerable adults were found in unsanitary conditions inside a Bowman Branch Highway home in Orangeburg County.
BOWMAN, S.C. — Two women are facing kidnapping and neglect charges after deputies say vulnerable adults were found living in poor conditions inside a home in Orangeburg County.
Deputies said the investigation began after a community health worker raised concerns about the care of several people at a home on Bowman Branch Highway.
An incident report states that the worker told investigators she saw a frail, blind man left on the floor in just a diaper while caregivers stepped over him.
When deputies arrived, they made contact with 19-year-old Octavia Brown, who led them inside.
Investigators said they found residents in unsanitary conditions that included urine on the floor, minimal bedding, dirty clothes, and rooms secured with padlocks that could not be opened from the inside.
The report stated that Brown told a deputy the padlock was in place, so the residents would not walk off.
Paramedics took each of them to MUSC Health Orangeburg for medical care, and the Department of Social Services (DSS) placed them in protective custody.
Investigators said 65-year-old Eula Mae Jones and her granddaughter, 19-year-old Octavia Jamyra Brown, each face five counts of kidnapping and neglect of a vulnerable adult. Both posted $15,000 bond.
The Department of Public Health (DPH) said the home was not licensed as a care facility.
News19 asked DSS if they are placing the patients in a new home.
“The closing of a facility or boarding home may happen for numerous reasons, and ... DSS and Adult Protective Services is willing to assist the residents if they consent along with representatives from the Department of Aging,” the agency said in response.
Authorities said the investigation is ongoing as they continue to determine the full extent of neglect at the home. Code enforcement and the fire marshal are also investigating, with inspectors later condemning the home due to unsafe floors, unsanitary conditions and structural concerns.
County officials called in code enforcement and the fire marshal. Inspectors later condemned the home, citing unsafe floors, unsanitary conditions, and structural concerns.
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) - A body found in Orangeburg County has been identified as a 23-year-old woman who had been missing since February 2024.Orangeburg County Sheriff Leroy Ravenell announced that human remains located in March have been identified as Cloe Williams after an extensive autopsy. Williams was 23 years old when she was reported missing.“On one hand, we finally have an identity, yet on the other, we still have a loss of life,” the sheriff said. “My team has been in continued contact with the family ...
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) - A body found in Orangeburg County has been identified as a 23-year-old woman who had been missing since February 2024.
Orangeburg County Sheriff Leroy Ravenell announced that human remains located in March have been identified as Cloe Williams after an extensive autopsy. Williams was 23 years old when she was reported missing.
“On one hand, we finally have an identity, yet on the other, we still have a loss of life,” the sheriff said. “My team has been in continued contact with the family since she went missing, and we ask prayers for them at this time.”
According to deputies, the autopsy revealed the Neeses woman suffered a gunshot wound. With the new information, Ravenell said the case will now be investigated as a homicide.
“We, the family of Cloe Williams, are heartbroken to learn that she was unfortunately found deceased,” the family of Williams said in a statement. “While it is not the outcome we had hoped for, we can now put to rest the question, ‘Where is Cloe?’
“Our family is very grateful to the Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Office for their hard work and dedication to this case, and we are thankful for the prayers and support from the community.”
Deputies urge anyone with information on the case to contact the Orangeburg County Communications Center at 803-534-3550.
Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our , and . Have feedback that can help us improve? .
Watch WIS live during newscasts and Soda City Living in the livestream player below. When WIS is not on the air, the player will feature Gray Media’s Local News Live.
ORANGEBURG, S.C. (WIS) - Staff at a South Carolina Waffle House location have started a strike, demanding better pay and working conditions.The Union of Southern Service Workers said union workers at a location on Five Chop Road in Orangeburg began a four-day strike on Sunday.The union claims Waffle House automatically deducts at least $3 per shift from workers’ paychecks for a “meal credit” - regardless of whether they have a break or eat a meal. In a statement, the union says the Orangeburg workers are among...
ORANGEBURG, S.C. (WIS) - Staff at a South Carolina Waffle House location have started a strike, demanding better pay and working conditions.
The Union of Southern Service Workers said union workers at a location on Five Chop Road in Orangeburg began a four-day strike on Sunday.
The union claims Waffle House automatically deducts at least $3 per shift from workers’ paychecks for a “meal credit” - regardless of whether they have a break or eat a meal. In a statement, the union says the Orangeburg workers are among “other Waffle House cooks and servers who say this unfair deduction, taken even when they are denied the right to take food home, takes away the money workers rely on to get by.”
According to the union, workers also reported feeling threatened, harassed and ignored by management when they came to them with concerns about safety at work. One worker described a particular incident where they claimed a customer touched them to the point where another employee had to get involved, but nothing happened when they reportedly went to management.
The USSW says the workers are asking for more fair scheduling, a safer work environment with 24/7 unarmed security, a $25 per hour minimum wage and “a seat at the table for workers to fight for better conditions.”
WIS has reached out to Waffle House for comment.
Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our , and . Have feedback that can help us improve? .
Watch WIS live during newscasts and Soda City Living in the livestream player below. When WIS is not on the air, the player will feature Gray Media’s Local News Live.
ORANGEBURG, S.C. (WIS) - On Thursday, school leaders in Orangeburg placed the last beam on a new high school, marking a significant milestone for construction.Students and staff also got a tour of their future home. Orangeburg-Wilkinson High School junior class president Ralley Wright said the current school is slowly falling apart.“Little technology issues, boards not working, wifi, different things like that, leaks in the ceiling and I think here there’s going to be none of that,” she said.Superintend...
ORANGEBURG, S.C. (WIS) - On Thursday, school leaders in Orangeburg placed the last beam on a new high school, marking a significant milestone for construction.
Students and staff also got a tour of their future home. Orangeburg-Wilkinson High School junior class president Ralley Wright said the current school is slowly falling apart.
“Little technology issues, boards not working, wifi, different things like that, leaks in the ceiling and I think here there’s going to be none of that,” she said.
Superintendent Shawn Foster said the current high school is not extremely old but was in need of renovations.
“Although it’s not an extremely old facility, the renovations and the disarray the building was in just from its HVAC systems, it made more sense to build a brand-new facility than to try to go back in and renovate an existing facility that still, even at this endpoint, may not give the students the educational opportunities that they deserve,” he said.
Construction on the new Orangeburg-Wilkinson High School started last year on Cook Road. The facility is one of the largest projects funded by the district’s $190 million bond referendum, with a final estimated cost of $135 million
The new facility will be able to serve up to 1,500 students. It will include a new athletic field, career and technical education labs and performing arts facilities—all things students like Xion Goldsmith are excited about.
“It’s really nice. I’m really excited for the new year,” he said.
Current principal Dr. Patricia Moultrie-Goldsmith graduated from Orangeburg-Wilkinson High School in 1992 and said she’s proud to see her alma mater transform.
“To be able to see this building erected is just a momentous occasion, and I’m just very proud,” she said.
As construction comes to the final stages, Foster said he looks forward to carrying on the legacy of the old school.
“It symbolizes this community coming together and moving forward education,” he said.
Construction on this new facility is expected to wrap up by next fall.
Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our , and . Have feedback that can help us improve? .
Carl Sagan
Let's be the exception.