Defense Operations Risk Counsel for Defense and Space Contractors

Defense Contractor Attorney Near West Ashley, SC

Of all the valuable assets that defense industry contractors have, their reputation and credibility with government customers and regulators rank among the highest. That's especially true as it relates to Law of War compliance. In an atmosphere of increasingly pervasive regulation, heightened scrutiny, and aggressive enforcement directed at government contractors, members of the defense industry need to prioritize legal and regulatory compliance and risk mitigation. To do so, it is proactive and strategic to work with a defense contractor attorney Near West Ashley, SC for tailored guidance.

Defense Contractor Attorney West Ashley, SC

Law of War 101

If you're a defense contractor using Google to search for a defense contractor compliance attorney, you're probably well-versed in the Laws of War. But if you're unaware of these laws or you're starting a business geared towards DoD contracting, it's crucial that you understand IHL and the compliance standards you must meet. Otherwise, you could face serious consequences and lose your ability to provide goods and services across the domains of land, sea, air, space, and cyber.

What is the Law of War?

The Law of War, often referred to as International Humanitarian Law (IHL) or the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC), comprises a set of international treaties and customary laws that establish guidelines for conduct during armed conflicts. Its primary aim is to minimize unnecessary suffering for the wounded and sick, prisoners of war (POWs), and civilians caught up in hostilities. In a nutshell, the primary goal of the Laws of War is to help save lives and promote some degree of humanity during armed conflicts.

To achieve this, IHL governs the conduct of wars, striking a balance between weakening the opponent and minimizing suffering. The principles of warfare are global. The Geneva Conventions, which form the foundation of IHL, have been ratified by all 196 states. Very few international agreements enjoy such widespread support.

All parties involved in a conflict must adhere to IHL, including both state forces and nonState armed groups. If the Law of War is violated, there are repercussions. War crimes are recorded and examined by nations and international tribunals, and individuals may face prosecution for war crimes.

The Law of War also applies to defense contractors, who must uphold strict compliance standards in order to sell their services. Sometimes, DoD contractors are unaware of or unprepared to meet these compliance standards. That is why they should consult with a government contractor attorney Near West Ashley, SC, like Richard Waring, who focuses on Law of War compliance matters.

Some examples of Law of War compliance as it relates to defense contractors include:

dotCivilian Protection

Defense contractors, especially private military and security companies (PMSCs), are obligated to follow international humanitarian law (IHL) concerning the safeguarding of civilians and civilian objects. They must promote that they do not engage directly in hostilities if those involved are considered to be civilians.

dotAccountability

Both people employed by defense contractors and the companies they work for may face legal accountability for breaches of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). This encompasses possible criminal charges for serious violations of the Geneva Conventions and assigning blame to superiors for the actions of their subordinates.

dotUse of Force

Although defense contractors are typically not permitted to engage in offensive use of force, they may be granted permission to utilize force in situations of self-defense or to safeguard other civilians or their property.

Federal Procurement Legal Counsel West Ashley, SC

4 Basic Rules of International Humanitarian Law

Four of the most basic rules of IHL include the following:

dot01

Parties involved in a conflict must always make a clear distinction between civilians and combatants to protect the civilian population and their property. No attacks should be directed at the civilian population as a whole or at individual civilians. Instead, military actions should be aimed solely at military targets.

dot02

Individuals who are unable or unwilling to engage in combat have the right to life and to be treated with care for their physical and mental health. They should always be safeguarded and treated humanely, without any discrimination. It is prohibited to kill or injure an adversary who has surrendered or who is no longer able to participate in the fighting.

dot03

Neither the conflicting parties nor their military personnel possess an unrestricted right to select their methods and means of warfare. The use of weapons or warfare methods that may result in unnecessary casualties or excessive suffering is prohibited.

dot04

Those who are injured or ill should be gathered and provided care by the party in control of them. Medical staff, health facilities, and transport vehicles are to be protected from attack. Individuals displaying the recognized symbol of the Red Cross, Red Crescent, or Red Crystal on a white background, as well as facilities and vehicles marked with these symbols, must be treated with respect.

False Claims Act Defense Attorney West Ashley, SC

A Real-World Example of When Law of War Applies

Understanding DoD and international Law of War is about more than memorizing complex legal terms. Let's look at a real-life scenario where it applies.

Consider a drone strike aimed at a suspected terrorist hideout nestled within a crowded village. While the strike may be seen as a necessary military action, the risk of civilian casualties raises serious questions about proportionality. In this context, here's how the principles of the Law of War come into play:

dotProportionality

Is the expected military benefit greater than the possible harm to civilians? Are there safer alternatives that could accomplish the same goal?

dotDistinction

Is it possible for intelligence to verify if the hideout contains solely combatants, or might there be civilians unknowingly present as well?

dotNecessity

Is this the only way to tackle the threat, or are there less harmful alternatives that can be considered?

Situations like those outlined above are complicated issues. There are no easy solutions to them. Commanders often face heart-wrenching decisions, weighed down by the potential consequences of their actions. Meanwhile, defense contractors must take significant strides to promote that their products and services comply with DoD and international Law of War mandates.

That's why open and clear communication among military leaders, military companies, legal advisors, and the public is essential. By sharing their thought processes, the factors they consider, and the efforts made to reduce civilian harm, they can promote understanding and foster accountability. If you own a company that supplies the military or DoD, working with a lawyer who specializes in defense contractor compliance could save your business and your reputation.

SBA Fraud Defense Lawyer West Ashley, SC

Why Private Military Companies Need Defense Contractor Attorneys Near West Ashley, SC

In 2010, the global market for private military companies (PMC) was estimated to be worth $200 billion and to employ around one million individuals. Today, the PMC sector provides a diverse array of services, with some firms having more than ten thousand employees. In Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. Army has depended on private military firms and defense contractors for many reasons, including:

  • Logistics Support
  • Intel Support
  • Weapons Management
  • Security
  • Military and Police Force Training
  • Military Construction

In March 2011, the U.S. Department of Defense cited more defense contractor personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq at 155,000 than active military members, 145,000. In those two regions alone, defense contractors accounted for 52% of the U.S. workforce. With those figures in mind and with increasingly volatile and dangerous attacks in areas like Israel and Iran, military companies are in high demand.

Military Contract Legal Services West Ashley, SC

How a Government Contractor Attorney Near West Ashley, SC, Helps promote Law of War Compliance

If you're a defense contractor - whether large or small - now is the time to promote compliance with both international and DoD Law of War rules and provide appropriate training to key personnel. Here are just a few ways that defense contractor compliance law firms like Conflict Orbit can help your defense company uphold IHL laws.

Federal Contractor Legal Representation West Ashley, SC

Incident Response Readiness and Support

Conflict Orbit provides in-depth compliance readiness and policy development support to help your business meet Law of War requirements with confidence. Richard Waring helps create a framework that supports operational integrity and contract security. With the rising scrutiny in federal procurement, now is the time to get your business audit-ready and fully aligned with government expectations.

This service can also include pre-design or post-design legal reviews for organizations designing weapons platforms with the goal of marketing them to the government. The government will require these systems to comply with the Law of War, and performing a front-end compliance review may help ensure alignment with government expectations and mitigate potential legal risks.

Defense Contractor Attorney West Ashley, SC

Operational Risk Assessment and Mitigation

For defense contractors, comprehensive risk assessments and mitigation services can mean the difference between being in business and bankruptcy. When tailored to the unique challenges of private military organizations, this service evaluates potential legal, operational, and compliance risks related to Law of War obligations, identifying vulnerabilities and recommending targeted strategies to address them.

Whether assessing technology, weapons systems, or operational practices, experienced attorneys like Richard Waring are needed for many reasons, including:

  • Promoting Compliance
  • Minimizing Legal Exposure
  • Protecting Your Operations in High-Risk Environments
  • Safeguarding Your Organization as a Whole
Government Contract Defense Lawyer West Ashley, SC

Compliance Audits

In-depth Law of War audits are very important for assessing and strengthening an organization's compliance with international and Department of Defense (DoD) Law of War obligations. These audits can carefully evaluate an organization's policies, procedures, training programs, and operational practices to help them better align with Law of War standards. When you hire a defense contractor attorney Near West Ashley, SC to perform an audit, you're taking proactive steps to promote your operations adhere to Law of War principles. Just as important, you're demonstrating a commitment to lawful conduct in conflict scenarios.

Federal Procurement Legal Counsel West Ashley, SC

Partner and Third Party Screening

Comprehensive partner due diligence and screening services, help organizations evaluate potential collaborators, contractors, or third parties for Law of War compliance and applicable regulatory standards. Due diligence and screening services may include the following:

  • Detailed Background Checks
  • Business Practice Evaluations
  • Past Performance Evaluations
  • Legal Standing Evaluations

By performing thorough due diligence, organizations can reduce the risk of partnering with non-compliant or unreliable entities, ensuring smoother and more lawful operations in conflict-affected environments.

False Claims Act Defense Attorney West Ashley, SC

Operational Risk Training

Custom training and education programs from defense contract lawyers help your organization better understand Law of War obligations. Since training is often a necessity for defense contractors, it should always be taken seriously. IHL sessions go over a variety of topics, from following the Geneva and Hague Conventions to navigating ethical conduct in conflict zones, all tailored to fit your specific needs. Whether it's for senior leaders or frontline staff, this type of education and training gives you the knowledge needed to tackle legal challenges and keep practices lawful in highrisk situations.

SBA Fraud Defense Lawyer West Ashley, SC

Research, Report Writing, and Presentations

These Law of War compliance services include in-depth research, detailed report writing, and professional presentations on IHL topics tailored to your defense organization's needs. Whether analyzing complex legal issues, drafting compliance reports, or delivering briefings to leadership, these options provide you with wellsupported insights to inform decision-making. Be sure to ask your government contractor attorney about how they can turn legal and regulatory frameworks into actionable guidance so that your team can stay informed and prepared when it matters most.

Conflict Orbit: Bespoke Defense Contractor Legal Compliance Near West Ashley, SC

Around the globe, conflict is evolving. If you're a defense contractor and you're not making adjustments to secure your operations, you could violate the Law of War. However, with compliance counsel from Conflict Orbit, you can focus on doing what you're best at while lead attorney Richard Waring protects your legal interests.

The Conflict Orbit Difference

Throughout Richard's professional career, he has seen a lack of private legal services for companies who need guidance on maintaining federally and internationally mandated compliance with the Law of War. He also observed that many contractors are unaware of these requirements.

As a former Intelligence Officer with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and a current U.S. Army JAG Officer (National Guard), Richard has had real-life exposure to the Law of War. He is a creative and relentless attorney who also has a background in criminal justice (prosecution, defense, and investigations) and education in drone and space law.

DISCLAIMER: Conflict Orbit, LLC is a private law firm and Richard Waring is not affiliated with or endorsed by the DoD.

Richard investigated and prosecuted 1000s of criminal cases with relentlessness, including the most serious violent crimes. As a prolific trial attorney, he held countless criminals accountable for their actions while refining the skills of communication, attention to detail, and persistence in the face of challenging legal scenarios.

Having defended numerous clients accused of wrongdoing, Richard has the ability to view legal scenarios from all sides. He utilized creativity, persuasion, and a strong work ethic to obtain positive results.

Former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) intelligence officer in the Intelligence Community's Prisoner of War (POW)/Missing in Action (MIA) Analytic Cell. The Cell provides intelligence support to military personnel recovery efforts for POW/MIAs, hostages, and kidnapped individuals worldwide. The Cell also currently supports unresolved U.S. and allied kidnapping cases by politically motivated anti-U.S. groups around the world.

As a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Army (National Guard) Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAG Corps), Richard received formal Law of War military legal training. He currently faithfully serves both his country and state of South Carolina as a Judge Advocate, and Richard feels privileged to be able to serve in this capacity.

DISCLAIMER: Conflict Orbit, LLC is a private law firm and Richard Waring is not affiliated with or endorsed by the DoD.

On a personal level, Richard is committed to reducing the amount of harm to the wounded and sick, POWs, and civilians in armed conflict. He has reorganized his law firm to be an innovative option for organizations needing guidance on Law of War compliance. Above all, Richard finds duty to country and service to others the highest callings, and it inspires him to know that his work potentially saves lives.

Is your defense organization ready to withstand what the future holds? If you're unsure, now is the time to act. Contact Conflict Orbit today and protect yourself from an uncertain tomorrow.

What Others Have Said

DISCLAIMER: This information, which includes non-client endorsements and testimonials from paying clients, should not be construed as a guarantee of any result in your matter. Past results do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Request Information

Latest News Near West Ashley, SC

South Carolina Supreme Court denies North Charleston's annexation bid into West Ashley

WEST ASHLEY, S.C. (WCIV) — Efforts by the city of North Charleston to expand its boundaries further into West Ashley were rejected by the South Carolina Supreme Court.In a case dating back to 2017, the city Charleston and the National Trust for Historic Preservation argued that North Charleston's attempt at annexing an acre of land on the opposite side of Highway 61 was illegitimate because the the action would skip over a strip of land owned by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and annexed into Charleston, creating a...

WEST ASHLEY, S.C. (WCIV) — Efforts by the city of North Charleston to expand its boundaries further into West Ashley were rejected by the South Carolina Supreme Court.

In a case dating back to 2017, the city Charleston and the National Trust for Historic Preservation argued that North Charleston's attempt at annexing an acre of land on the opposite side of Highway 61 was illegitimate because the the action would skip over a strip of land owned by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and annexed into Charleston, creating a 100-foot-wide highway buffer that breaks contiguity with North Charleston.

READ MORE | "Turf war between Charleston, North Charleston continues over property in West Ashley."

The dispute began after the legal annexation of Runnymede Plantation, which touches a portion of the Ashley River, when North Charleston was also given the one-acre parcel opposite Highway 61.

On Jan. 21, the state Supreme Court overturned the South Carolina Court of Appeals' decision, which claimed Charleston and the National Trust didn't have standing to sue. The court stated that Charleston and the National Trust have grounds to challenge North Charleston's annexation, which did not comply with state law.

"Although we looked forward to allowing the property owners to join the city of North Charleston, we respect the Supreme Court’s ruling and will abide by its decision," North Charleston spokesperson Tony Tassarotti said.

North Charleston didn't provide details on any plans to attempt more land acquisitions in the area. At the time of the litigation, both cities were led by differing mayoral administrations. Additionally, the municipalities were locked into a turf war, with Charleston annexing the 2,500-acre property at the Whitfield tract – directly adjacent the one-acre parcel in question before the state Supreme Court.

READ MORE | "North Charleston attempting to annex portion of West Ashley."

Charleston also annexed a second property called Millbrook Plantation LLC., in a bid to prevent development if North Charleston were to obtain the land.

North Charleston also attempted to annex the Whitfield tract land, but without the one-acre parcel, it would not have been "contiguous" with the city.

In the Supreme Court's January decision, the court clarified that the one-acre parcel off Highway 61 was not adjacent to North Charleston, making the initial attempt at annexation invalid.

News 4 reached out to the city of Charleston for comment and is awaiting word back.

READ MORE | "Cities of N.Charleston and Charleston continue legal battle of annexed acre in West Ashley."

Supreme Court documents on the case can be read below.

This appeal arises from an action filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the City of Charleston challenging the City of North Charleston's attempted annexation of real property near Highway 61 and the Ashley River. National Trust and Charleston appeal the court of appeals' decision affirming the circuit court's ruling that National Trust and Charleston lacked standing to challenge North Charleston's annexation. We find both National Trust and Charleston have standing and reverse the court of appeals. The court of appeals found it unnecessary to reach the substantive issues regarding the legality of the annexation, which issues were fully briefed at the court of appeals. We now certify those issues for our review pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, dispense with further briefing, and affirm the circuit court's alternative ruling that North Charleston did not lawfully annex the property because the property is not "adjacent" to North Charleston's existing city limits.

SC Supreme Court rejects North Charleston's attempt to snag rural West Ashley property

NORTH CHARLESTON — Nearly a decade after North Charleston annexed a one-acre parcel west of the Ashley River that initiated a lengthy legal fight, the state Supreme Court on Jan. 21 ruled the annexation invalid.The city of Charleston and the National Trust for Historic Preservation argued North Charleston’s “leap frog” annexation threatened to destroy the character and continuity of the rural Ashley River Historic District.In 2023, the S.C. Court of Appeals sided with North Charleston and did not block t...

NORTH CHARLESTON — Nearly a decade after North Charleston annexed a one-acre parcel west of the Ashley River that initiated a lengthy legal fight, the state Supreme Court on Jan. 21 ruled the annexation invalid.

The city of Charleston and the National Trust for Historic Preservation argued North Charleston’s “leap frog” annexation threatened to destroy the character and continuity of the rural Ashley River Historic District.

In 2023, the S.C. Court of Appeals sided with North Charleston and did not block the annexation.

The state Supreme Court came to a different conclusion. The court ruled Charleston and the National Trust have legal standing to challenge North Charleston that the annexation did not follow state law.

“This is a great outcome for the City of Charleston and the region,” Charleston Mayor William Cogswell said in a statement. “Having a large tract of land that is well outside the range of service annexed into a city is the opposite of a smart growth strategy, so to me this is a win-win.”

In a statement, North Charleston spokesman Tony Tassarotti said the city looked forward to allowing property owners to join the city through the annexation, but the city respects the court’s decision.

“We respect the Supreme Court’s ruling and will abide by its decision,” he said.

In 2017, North Charleston legally annexed a 113-acre tract called the Runnymede Plantation off S.C. Highway 61 owned by the Whitfield Construction Company. This annexation was valid because the property touches the Ashley River, making it contiguous to North Charleston.

State law says land contiguous to a municipality can be annexed.

The company then gave North Charleston an acre of land on the other side of the highway, which was part of a another 2,200-acre tract. The city of Charleston argued the one-acre annexation was not valid because it jumps over a strip of land that was owned by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and annexed into Charleston, making the parcel not contiguous to North Charleston due to the 100-foot-wide buffer running along the highway.

North Charleston justified the annexation with a state statute that says a city may annex land it already owns if it’s adjacent to the city limits, making the court determine if “adjacent” is different from “contiguous.”

Around the same time, both cities set their sights on claiming unincorporated Charleston County land located in the Ashley River Historic District.

Charleston annexed roughly 6,000 acres in the surrounding area, including the 2,200-acre Whitfield tract and a 30-acre property called Millbrook Plantation LLC. The city did not get permission from either property owner, but instead used the 75 percent rule, which allowed the city to take the properties without the owners’ approval if 75 percent of surrounding property owners with 75 percent of the total land value requested to join the city.

North Charleston struck back two days later with its own attempt to annex the Whitfield and Millbrook properties. North Charleston finished its annexation process before Charleston, despite starting a couple of days later.

Without the one-acre parcel, these properties would not be contiguous to North Charleston.

In 2023, the state appeals court’s ruling affirmed the 2019 decision by Circuit Judge Eugene Griffith Jr. that stated neither Charleston nor the National Trust had the legal right to challenge North Charleston’s annexation.

Chief Judge Bruce Williams called the legal battle no more than a “boundary dispute between two municipalities,” according to the 2023 decision.

Nearly three years later, the state Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals’ decision, stating Charleston and the National Trust have legal standing. The court also affirmed the circuit court's alternative ruling that North Charleston did not lawfully annex the property because the one-acre tract is not "adjacent" to existing city limits.

The court clarified “adjacent” is not synonymous with “contiguous,” and state annexation statutes are premised on the requirement of continuity.

West Ashley building abandoned for years finally gets repaired. Here’s what’s moving in.

CHARLESTON — A local couple has found a treasure in a rundown building that was trashed for years on a busy West Ashley thoroughfare.The tiny spot at 2177 Ashley River Road formerly housed a dry cleaner business and has since languished without a tenant as vandals covered it in graffiti and homeless camped out in the back.But Jessica and Russell Luzier, owners of the family-run Stone Castings of Charleston, saw promise in it.The couple are doing their best to revive the heavily trafficked property — though th...

CHARLESTON — A local couple has found a treasure in a rundown building that was trashed for years on a busy West Ashley thoroughfare.

The tiny spot at 2177 Ashley River Road formerly housed a dry cleaner business and has since languished without a tenant as vandals covered it in graffiti and homeless camped out in the back.

But Jessica and Russell Luzier, owners of the family-run Stone Castings of Charleston, saw promise in it.

The couple are doing their best to revive the heavily trafficked property — though the project is taking much longer than expected. Jessica Luzier said they were hoping to open their storefront and manufacturing warehouse for custom-made stone products, such as fireplaces, countertops and fountains, this time last year. But extensive damage to the building and permit roadblocks have dragged the timeline out.

“When we took it over it was an abandoned property at that time and people had broken down the door to live inside and out back,” Luzier said. “There’s been a lot of neglect through the years, but also the people who moved in, they stripped the wiring out of the building and all that kind of stuff.”

Further hold-ups included adding a fire hydrant, which Luzier said she never anticipated to be their financial responsibility; coordinating to remove the garbage, such as rubber tires and drug paraphernalia dumped on the property over the years; and “emergency repairs” to water seal the building.

Luzier said she pleaded with Charleston County to allow her and her husband to jump a few steps ahead to stop water — and people — from getting in and wrecking the property further. She hopes those concerned about the condition and status of the site now can understand the timeline better.

Feeling at times as though they have taken one step forward and another step back, Luzier noted that the building was vandalized again a few weeks ago. She arrived to find the storefront’s newly installed $20,000 windows shattered.

As a small business owner, she said that’s not the kind of cash they have on hand for a quick fix.

The Luziers purchased the property for $515,000 in 2024, according to county records. It’s sandwiched between the large West Chase Apartment complex and the Interstate-526 overpass.

While the street frontage is narrow, the parcel spans almost an acre backward. The Luziers are using the extra space to constructing a manufacturing warehouse where they can hand-make their products on-site.

“We were really looking for something to make our home and outfit the space and we saw this would be a good fit for our business,” Luzier said.

She noted the store, expected to open in February or March, is a prime location for Stone Casting’s customers, which span all the way to Kiawah Island and Isle of Palms.

Stone Castings of Charleston has been in business for 20 years, though the Luziers bought out the company four years ago. They currently lease their nearby operational space at 1708 Pineview Road.

Future plans for the commercial site include adding a second floor to the main building and incorporating home décor items, as well as complementary pots and stone corbels, to their shoppable inventory.

“A lot of Charleston still doesn’t know that we’re here and people stumble upon us all the time,” Luzier said. “We’re really excited about the new spot because we’re going to try and use it as a reintroduction to the area and show people what we do.”

Disclaimer:

This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Service Areas

"Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception."

Carl Sagan

Let's be the exception.